food affordibility

All food systems fall short of offering the best nutrition

According to a recent study, although food affordability has increased due to the transformation of food systems over the past 50 years, this has had a detrimental effect on inclusion, equity, nutrition, and environmental health. As per a report released in the journal Nature Food on September 19, 2022, all food systems fall short of offering the best nutrition and health outcomes, environmental sustainability, inclusiveness, and equity for everyone. It went on to say that as food systems evolved from rural to industrialized, so did the cost of a suggested diet.

Accessibility or actual consumption of a healthy diet has not always followed food affordability

Accessibility or actual consumption of a healthy diet has not always followed the food affordability. In addition to obesity and disorders linked to diet, hunger and poverty are both on the rise.

Over three billion people worldwide and the vast majority of people living in rural and traditional countries cannot afford to eat healthfully. Even now, inequality is pervasive, and environmental deterioration has gone beyond what is safe.

Up until the modernization and formalization of the food systems, fruits and vegetables exhibit a growing per-capita supply. But in industrialized and centralized nations, the supply declines.

This characteristic of the food systems in the industrial and consolidated category may be caused by lower levels of government support for fruit and vegetable production in comparison to other crops.

Individuals buy more meals made from animals as income increases

In countries with rural and traditional food systems, there was a declining trend in the supply of pulses, with the highest per-capita supply.

Many cultures view pulses and coarse grains like millets as inferior products, so when individuals have more money, they decide to eat fewer of these things.

The statistics supported the widely accepted assumption that individuals buy more meals made from animals as income increases.

In comparison to all other food sources, animal-source foods like dairy, meat, eggs, and fish account for 45% of the world’s protein supply.

Animal sources make for about 62% of the protein consumed in nations with industrialized and integrated food systems. In nations with rural and traditional food systems, this number falls to 21%.

Changes in agricultural methods and land use patterns are significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions. The proportions of these two major sources of emissions shift as food systems move from rural to industrialized.

 The increase of cropland and grassland are the main source of emissions

In nations with rural and traditional food systems, changes in land use patterns brought on by the increase of cropland and grassland are the main source of emissions.

In nations with rural and traditional food systems, changes in land use patterns brought on by the increase of cropland and grassland are the main source of emissions.

Countries employ more energy, transportation, processing, and packaging infrastructure as they industrialize, which results in greater emissions from various sources along the value chain.

According to the report, agricultural emissions continue to be a significant contributor, especially from the management of manure and fertilizers as well as methane produced by enteric fermentation in ruminant cattle.

According to the State of India’s Environment 2022 assessment by the nonprofit Centre for Science and Environment, agricultural activities are responsible for between 21 and 37% of the total amount of greenhouse gases released each year

The industrialized food systems have the highest food prices. The quality of the food supply may also be improving as costs for food rise. The accessibility of a variety of foods that satisfy dietary standards for a balanced, nutritious diet is a requirement for an affordable healthy diet.

The majority of people in industrialized nations and, on average, 82% of people in nations with developing and diverse food systems, can afford to eat healthfully.

Angola, Tajikistan, and Egypt were identified to be some prominent exceptions in the study

Compared to any other nation with a developing and informal food system, Angola stands out for having extraordinarily high food prices. The main causes of this are a generally low food supply and a high currency exchange rate brought on by significant oil earnings.

Tajikistan is a landlocked nation where 72% of the population lives in rural areas and has a rural and traditional food system. Even still, more than 50% of people can afford to eat healthily. The researchers were perplexed by the situation in Egypt, a nation with an informal and developing food system. When compared to many other nations with informal food systems, the food price indices for nutrient-dense food groups are significantly lower. However, just 16% of people can afford a healthful diet.

TO READ MORE CLICK HERE…..

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *